"This machine kills fascists..." (wrt Woody Guthrie...)
fart on conrad
the Rude Macedon
Conspiracy Theorist and F***ing Proud of It!!
question everything
fight lies
truth is beauty
hey big brother - guess who's watchin YOU HAHAHA!!!
Canadians Fighting for Canada
John Kaminski's latest: (040704) The Next Evolutionary Hurdle; and don't miss The Day America Died
Halifax International Symposium on
Media and Disinformation
911 inquiry
Halifax, Nova Scotia
July 1-4, 2004

Dude, there's MORE
911 inquiry
to the story!!

International Citizen's Inquiry Into 9/11
911 inquiry
Phase 2, Toronto, Canada May 25 – 30, 2004

0704-Oh Canada Day HAHA
0630-Election day eh?
0624-Not with a bang
0620-Charlie Brown Election
0616-Idle thoughts..
0606-Democracy haha..
0530-Hit the road Jose..
0523-the Occam thing...
0507-There I said it again..
0430-again and again...
0423-How many columns...
0416-fish rot from the head
0410-The Box II
0403-The Box
RM Archives
current Top Of The List!
Change - we know the problem - what the fuck are we going to DO about it is the question...??
Ammo - selection of very good commentary from other writers on important stuff - FAAAAARRRRR BETTER THAN TV!!!

Canadians for Canada Coalition (CCC) - United Left, if you will - but bottom of the line - Get Rid of Corporate Government in Canada - 2004 Federal Election may be your last chance - act NOW PLEASE!!

The Debt Conspiracy Theory Fact - do you believe people who email you from Africa wanting to give you 10 million bucks? No? Well WHY DO YOU BELIEVE THE NATIONAL DEBT IS LEGITIMATE?!?!? (Sorry - I get excited about this...)

911 - as important as the debt scam - ask yourself why you are so afraid to admit the truth here, even when it's been kicking you in the face almost since it happened? When the world you live in is operating under a lie this big and obvious and monstrous, you have no security whatsoever.

Word Warriors and Others of Note

Listed on BlogsCanada

Black Flag link

Unknown news link

Black Spot campaign Unbrand Your Life

Pogo knew....

stop this....

and this....

and this....
Thomas D'Aquino
Hand of Mordor
in Canada

Happy Canada Day

canada-american flag
stop this...
canada flag
save this...

1984 link

random quotes

If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever.

George Orwell 1984

"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones."
Albert Einstein

who dat?
mama mama who dat scary man mama??!!


- well, that sure didn't take long! - mere days after the election, the full court press is beginning against the new Canadian bogeyman - Proportional Representation!!!! - New voting plan carries many risks - again, like the Simpson piece from the Glob (sic hahahaha) last time, the Star is not bothering with any kind of rational examination of the facts (why bother with that shit when you KNOW you would lose?!?!?!), but gets the bogeyman stories going right up front - "...coalitions lead to the proliferation of small parties, some quite radical, that can exert undue influence on government. It's hard to see how democracy is better served when a handful of tiny splinter groups hold the balance of power... Promoters of voting reform often point to the Green party as an example of the sort of alternate views that have flourished under proportional representation. But not all new parties have had wholesome goals. Some, like France's National Front, have given voice to extremists...." - well, that's a great story, as they say, but it doesn't have a lot to do with the facts on the ground in Canada.

How does it relate, for instance, to the fact that the main party with a stated goal of breaking up Canada got almost half again as many seats under FPTP as it would have under PR???? HMmmmmm - let's not go THERE, says the Star!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAH - not to mention Harper's Repugnants whose main goal is destroying Canada by making it as much like the US as possible - considerably more seats under FPTP than they would have got under PR - hmmmmm!!! - and as far as "extremist" parties - a few examples would be nice, rather than "don't forget the BOGEYMAN UNDER THE BED CHILDREN!!!!" HAHAHAHAHA - and let's not forget to acknowledge that there is still a certain threshold that must be reached before such parties get any seats - in Canada, with 300 seats and 30 mil population, we're looking at something like 100,000 Canadians per seat - or something around 70,000 votes, after non-eligible voters are removed from the equation - it would be nice if the Star, instead of spreading bogeyman fictions, would elucidate a bit just how many such groups there are in Canada, that it perceives as a danger - such a danger that it does not want the NDP getting the 40 or 50 seats that the votes it garnered should give it!!! - wha??? Osama's cavemen going to come over in great hordes, go public, register as a Canadian Political Party (Progressive Terrorists????) and win a bunch of seats which it will then nefariously use to control the government of Canada as a terrorist base from which to bomb Washington???? Saddam loyalists???? Who, Star???? Name some names and never mind this bogeyman shit!!! Who are you afraid of that would be more dangerous than the Bloc or the Repug Norths???????

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAA - I'LL TELL you who the Star is afraid of, under their new corporate ownership!!!! - they're afraid of We the People of Canada EVER GETTING CONTROL OF OUR OWN FUCKING GOVERNMENT!!!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA

with the Star coming out against PR, I guess we can pretty much forget about it - without the media pushing for something, Canadians who have been well-trained to take their lead from them just aren't going to be thinking about it - or if they are, nobody's going to know about it, there's going to be no impression of a popular movement, Harper and Martin will get all the necessary press to say how they've thought it over carefully, but don't feel it's really in the country's best interest at this time, and anyway there are far more pressing issues to deal with - and RIP PR - and RIP Democracy in THIS country for the foreseeable future.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA - I hate to say it - but told ya so!!

This is a telling line - from Linda McQuaig's latest - nothing outstanding overall, she must be putting her good stuff into the new book - but from Same defect hampers the leaders, we get this quote - ".... In many ways, it was simply the tipping point. After all, the Liberals had been knee-deep in scandals about mishandling taxpayers' money before — with billions disappearing at HRDC and the gun registry... This time, however, a media frenzy took hold, and it became politically fashionable to question the notion that the Liberals were the only option..." - note that one phrase - "a media frenzy took hold..." - and there you have the clue, Watson, as to what has been happening here for a long time.

Now you can stand over there on the "coincidence" side of the field, and tell me how that was all just coincidence, and I can stand on the "NO FUCKING WAY HAHAHAHAHAHAAA" side of the field, and say things like - was LOWER TAXES LOWER TAXES LOWER TAXES just a coincidence?? etc etc and etc - and I will tell you, as I have before, that the debate in this country - and all western "democracies" to one extent or another - is DRIVEN by the Media (and those corporate leaders behind the scenes who control the media, of course) - they do NOT reflect what We the People are talking about - they TELL us what we are talking about - the MEDIA sets the agenda of debate in this country, NOT We the People!!!! - and thus, of course, when the media owners want to roll back democracy because it's getting too dangerous, and at the same time pad their pocketbooks, they start off with a big "LOWER TAXES LOWER TAXES" drive - and even though few rational people actually feel that they want to sacrifice the Canadian health care system on this neocon altar, they are driven to do just that after years of propaganda from the corporate press.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA - this is a good one! - Chewing on election leftovers - ol Richard Gwyn here - off to the cottage, and leaving us all with a few words of wisdom to mull on over the summer - doesn't take that long actually - he lets us know why the NDP didn't do so well this time around - ".... The post-election explanation New Democrats espouse is that a lot of their voters switched to the Liberals to stop the Conservatives... That's a bit too self-exculpatory. The NDP platform never generated any public interest or discussion. Leader Jack Layton's hyper-vocal, Energizer bunny style started to become tiresome — and threatens to become exceedingly tiresome in the years ahead...."

HAHAHAHAHA THAT'S REALLY FUCKING RICH RICHARD!!!! - not to mention a bit too - ummm - self-exculpatory??? - HAHAHAHAHA - I pointed out many times the last few days of the election campaign (all through it actually) wherein most "news" stories and columnists completely or mostly ignored the NDP in their final "somber analyses" of who the people would choose - and I will tell you, that in this media-dominated culture we live in, when people read column after column after news story after news story telling them that the only two "realistic" choices they have are the Libs or the Cons, 90% of them are going to vote for one of those two options. If the same news stories and columnists had of said there were 3 or 4 or 5 or whatever realistic choices rather than two, and have of been doing so during the whole campaign - well - things could well have been different.

We'll never know now for sure. Neither did Schroeder know about his cat at any given time - but that didn't mean that the cat wasn't there!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

- and ol Richard mentions PR too - his take is that we need a Royal Commission HAHAHAHAHAHAHAA - that's probably something the gov will keep in hand as a last resort if for some reason there is a public swelling of demand - it would put the decision off well past the next election HAHAHAHAHAHAAA - let things simmer down and then, like most Royal Commission reports, or other biggies like that (how fast is the Romanov report fading from memories these days HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAA) - well, on the shelf she goes, and we can put away that talk of democracy hahahaha excuse me PR for a few more years.


Ah - be fair, be fair! - the ODD columnist is on board with PR - such as Licia Corbella here - Elections out of proportion - What electoral map shows isn't good reflection of what voters say at ballot box. Way ta go Licia! - but it ain't gonna change what I said above - the editorial boards and "leading" columnistic opinion makers are going to zilch this thing.

HAHAHAHA - Marlon's best ever line that MOI can relate to - I'm sure you all know it HAHAHAHAHAHA - from The Wild Ones -

The Authority Figure: "So what exactly are you rebelling against anyway?"

Marlon: "Whadaya got?"



- more seriously - a good little piece on why Marlon was one of the greats - there's more to a person's life than acting, although you're not going to read much of this in the corporate press - A Eulogy For Our Marlon Brando by Dave Zirin

Nother interesting piece - "Progressive" Latin American Leaders Support the Coup in Haiti By Stan Goff - ".... The shameful fact, however, is that this time the occupation is being carried out by not only by the French, whose savage imperial history there is well known, and by the Canadians (perennial handmaidens of the US), but by Argentina, Brazil, and Chile--three nations who have themselves been victimised by the covert operations establishment of the United States, and governments who are making the now-specious claim that they are "progressive..." - just makes ya proud to be Canadian eh??? This is how much of the world regards Canada these days - keep votin fer them Bay St "Repugnant-North" Parties!!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Another short but succinct piece on 911 and why you ought to question the official story - Ten Reasons Why They Don't Want You To Know That No Hijackers Were Involved in 9/11.

Really, it occurs to me that there's an interesting phenomena going on right now - a struggle of titanic proportions, quite literally, behind the scenes almost all of it - we are in the midst of a great struggle to see if the mainstream corporate media can continue to dominate people's thinking as they increasingly have for the last 100 years or so in western societies - maintain the brainwashing, in effect, control the things people think about - or if people are going to learn to think for themselves, using the leadership of those who now have a chance to speak freely of what they know on the internet - an avenue they previously did not have.

Are you - we - going to continue to believe the corporate media when they say "We are Great! But there's a Bogeyman over there you should be terrified of!!!!" - or are we going to have that lightbulb experience collectively one of these days and realise -"Wait! YOU are the Bogeyman!!!!"

- and then it gets scary for awhile, because REAL bogeymen do not go down without a fight - once they know their cover is blown - the velvet glove will come off the iron fist - and then a lot of people are going to see the reason that the cops have been so well trained and equipped around here.

The election turnout last week once again set a new standard for fewest voters - them 40% now who didn't bother to participate in this rigged contest - what do you suppose they're all thinking about?!?!?!?!



040703-Happy Canada Day hahahaha

RIP Marlon. you was good.

Here is what Paul Martin - with the essential help of the corporate press in Canada - is going to be doing for the next few months: making himself and the Libs look REAL good - seeing that there are a couple of fairly high-profile "punishments" for the "adscam scandal", pumping a bunch of billions very publicly into health care through some arrangement with the premiers, making no commitment on Bush's Star Wars (a safe move as it looks as if ol George ain't gonna be around for Christmas in Washington HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAA - not that that's especially good news or anything, Kerry won't be much of an improvement, although he can probably talk better... - but they can put the formal agreement off until after the next Canadian election, and the 5-year "mandate" during which Canadian dictators do as they please), and stonewalling furiously (behind the scenes, not publicly!!!) on Layton's demands for a PR referendum (with the full help of the corporate press demonizing PR, as in the piece I mention later). Then sometime next year he can call another election, when the Lib war chest has been fully restocked but certainly not the NDPs - get his majority, and THEN we go to Star Wars (Kerry will push this just as much as Bush, as they are both being pushed behind the scenes by the military-industrial-media establishment, the people who really run the US) and biometric ID cards and privatised medicine and becoming the 51st State in everything but name only (the US don't want to have to look after us, they just want our stuff). Basically like that - details may vary HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAA (the Cons?? well - I figure that even the Bay St mandarins have sussed out that Canadians are just not ready to bet on that pony yet (they just had their best ever opportunity, and barely 4 million out of over 30 million people in Canada fell for their line and voted for them...)(yea I know that 10% of the 30 mil are under the age of 10, but let's not get too picky..), and they're scared shitless that they'll wake up if the Libs don't start looking a bit better and go to their only remaining home, the NDP - and THAT nightmare they do NOT want to have to deal with - far better to keep the Libs, for them, I figure....)

So - what we gotta do between now and the next election, if anyone gives a fuck about saving the country, which I think about all of 5% of us do, in realistic terms - those of us who care have to start working together - all the people like Layton's NDP and what's left of the CAP if they survive, NGOs like Maude's Council of Canadians, Friends of the CBC, the Sierra Club, etc and etc, and individuals like Mel Hurtig, Paul Hellyer, David Orchard, David Suzuki - all the groups and people who have been opposing the Bay St government of Canada have to start working together to save this country.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAA - I was going to ramble on about that, but why bother? It ain't never gonna happen. Like I said last time - not with a bang, but a whimper. Some of us will not be going gentle into that good night - but then we've never gone gently anywhere HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAA - the rest, well, I expect they'll be sitting there watching their tvs when the lights go out, or the knock comes on the door, or they go to the hospital someday and can't get in anymore, whatever - lots of ways to go.

Shit. I wasn't supposed to get depressed until the end HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA

- I gotta check into this - how much creativity and progress are we stifling by forcing everyone into this regime of "start work at 8 am and finish at 5" or whatever??? - I know for myself, I just get rolling later in the evening - and how many times have I cut something that was going well off because "it was time to eat" or "gotta get to bed so I can get up for work" or something???? A LOTTTTTTT would be my guess. The artists have always told the assembly-liners to take a hike, but I think we're still wasting a whole lot of talent. Of course, that don't really matter to the corporate mind - as I have seen time and time and time again, the first and most important quality of a good corporate worker is simply the willingness to do what you are told. Creativity is WAY down the list. People like me, who are real short on spending our time doing make-work stuff and "doing what we are told" are virtually unemployable in the corporate world. Thank (god) HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAA - sure be nice to have a LITTLE bit of money sometimes - but if the tradeoff is my brain, I'll do without for awhile longer HAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

Got so wrapped up in thinking about how the Bloc got three times as many seats as the NDP with three-quarters of the vote last time (that ain't a misprint - I can do numbers - check the figures yourself) that I didn't look further - but it's hard to imagine a system LESS democratic than the one we are operating under - Harper's Repugnantcons got less than twice as many votes as the NDP, but over FIVE times the number of seats!!! - and the Libs got about two and a half times the number of votes and over SEVEN times the number of seats!!!! Think on that - TOGETHER, these right-wing parties have the support of well under half of Canadians of voting age - even with a full-court press by the Canadian media. Check the letter in a minute.

- and not a freakin word in the media, outside of one or two articles saying that that crazy guy Layton is still going to try for this weird sort of leftie notion called "proportional representation" or something, whatever the hell that means - the system they have in countries like Italy, you know, where they get Pizza Parliaments all the time and nobody can govern effectively ..... HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA our GREAT FREE CANADIAN UNBIASED MEDIA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA all in favor of the GREAT FREE WONDERFUL CANADIAN DEMOCRACY HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA

(Rabble had a bit from Fair Vote Canada - What we said is not what we got - "... The NDP, rather than 19 seats would have had about 48. The Greens, rather than no seats, would have had about 12 seats. ... However, Gordon emphasised that had a fair voting system been used, many people would have voted differently and voter turnout would likely have been higher...")

- speaking of media - here's about the truest thing I've read in years on the state of the media - SHOVELING COAL FOR SATAN Christopher Hitchens collects check from Microsoft, calls Moore a coward By Matt Taibbi (good enough to save - RM archive copy) - don't let the title fool you - it starts with this Hitchens guy, but then gets into a very hard-hitting commentary of the US media - about 99% of which would apply to the Canadian media - sure we have a few pretty good people, mainly in the Star, but mainly as commentators, and even in the Star the standards of "journalism" leave a hell of a lot to be desired - and then towards the other end of the spectrum, where most of the media tend to congregate, we have the garbage called the National Pispot, which has since the day it began set new standards for printing propaganda and crap and trying to pass it off as "news".

- "...If journalists had courage, they would form unions and refuse to work for any company that made decisions about editorial content based on the bottom line, on profit..." - sure - and what's life like under the Aspers in Canada?????

Geezus - I read this and then literally shook my head to make sure I wasn't dreaming - something that a 3-year old might have written concerning the state of the world according to the lies he'd been told and how Santa was going to fix it all when the tooth fairy brought his dime that night - or whatever the tooth fairy brings these days. A complete fantasy - and yet passed off in the country's leading corporate newspaper as some sort of intelligent commentary - by a writer who "...a former adviser to federal trade ministers, is now head of investment issues for the World Trade Organization..." !!!!!!! - Voters: democracy's downside - Unable to resolve our own contradictions, we scapegoat politicians, says former federal adviser by one John Hancock (RM archive copy). Given this guys position it is just not credible to pretend he actually believes the shit he is peddling so, in good Holmesian detection, we are left with only the probability that he is lying, trying to convince Canadians that this sort of stuff actually reflects reality.

I was so amazed and incensed that rather than gibbering away here for a few lines I decided to write another letter to add to the Unpublished Letters file (see how confidently I predict that!!!! - but we KNOW that there is no way the Globe is going to publish anything that blows their cherished fantasies (or necessary illusions as others have put it - take your pick) THAT far out of the water. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAA)

Dear Globe,
RE: Voters: democracy's downside Unable to resolve our own contradictions, we scapegoat politicians, says former federal adviser JOHN HANCOCK, Friday, July 2, 2004

One hardly knows where to begin in formulating a response to this amazing piece - the whole commentary from beginning to end is completely nonsensical, a fantasy unrelated to reality worthy of the Brothers Grimm based on either intentional dissembling and misdirection or a completely out-of-touch interpretation of what is happening in Canada and the world, the odd statement of fact therein being then interpreted as if through some Aliconian looking glass by a shifty-eyed, hookah-smoking creepy-crawly trying to sell me some beachfront property on Baffin Island or something.

Well, since one must begin somewhere, let's start at the beginning, where Mr. Hancock lays the foundation of hallucinatory, disconnected-from-reality ramblings for what is to follow.

" At a time when voters have never had more power, better government, greater prosperity and progress, rarely have they been less satisfied..." states Mr. Hancock.

Hahahaha! I cannot help but laugh upon reading this! Straight out of Dickens! "That young Twist has never been so well fed - I can't understand why he is constantly complaining!"

Well really?!?!? - one says in wonderment! - "more power"?? - how so?!?! One asks puzzledly - when Canadians constantly get governments who have received perhaps 25% support of the voting age population, either provincially or federally, and which governments then proceed to enact laws and undertake activities that most voters disagree with - more power?!?!?! I know I am in agreement with many others when I say I have never felt like I had LESS power invested in "my" governments! (well, I realise belatedly - I suppose that 25% feels quite happy! - they certainly have "more power" than the rest of us!)

- and "better government"?? - better than what, one naturally wonders! - better perhaps than Attila the Hun, better certainly than George Bush's New Republican Fascists - but that hardly suffices! - Oliver Twist was undoubtedly better off than some also - but that does not mean his gruel was sufficient! But more relevantly, is our government, which is better than George Bush's, better than past Canadian governments, which one might assume contextually Mr. Hancock is referring to? We have had good governments in Canada, from the first - Sir John A - to the most recent "real" Canadian PM Pierre Trudeau, who were REAL Canadians working to make Canada better for Canadians, and undertaking programs and initiatives such as unemployment insurance, the Canada Health Act, OAP, expanded opportunities for education, improved infrastructure, honest and efficient bureaucracies to carry out OUR national business, etc and etc, which made the lives of average Canadians pretty unarguably better and more secure - but not now, when, for the last 20 years, we have had governments which were intent on destroying the country in one way or another, both through removing these "social programs" that gave us some security, gutting the bureaucracy and replacing its leaders with party hacks whose main goal was reducing services or funnelling money to party supporters, and also doing their best to remove our independence and turning us - and our wealth - over to American control, first through Mulroney's "Canada is for sale" government, through Chretien's NAFTA, and our current sort-of leader's determination to "forge closer ties with America" - when most of us already feel that the American government already has FAR too much influence on Canadian decisions. "Better" government??? I cannot imagine where Mr. Hancock is getting his info! Better for who???? - NOT mr and ms average Canadian!

And "greater prosperity and progress"?? Really??!! - 30 years ago, and prior, almost all families in Canada could support themselves in a reasonable way for their times on the earnings of one person working, own their own modest home, and even be accumulating some savings for retirement - now it takes two people working just to get by, and savings have never been so low. That's "prosperity and progress"??? - and the average debt of Canadian families has been constantly rising through the neocon decades, until now the average Canadian debt is more than the average annual income - their "prosperity and progress" has never been in greater jeopardy, with many if not most of these families no more than a couple of missed paychecks from destitution and being kicked out of their heavily mortgaged homes!!! "prosperity and progress"???? What world is Mr. Hancock living in??? Perhaps the Bay St Towers world or the Rosedale enclaves - the richest 2 or 3% of Canadians are certainly far better off with their lower taxes and globalisation - but it is simply fantastical to believe that their prosperity is "trickling down" - the money flow has been all the other way for the last couple of decades.

At least your Mr. Hancock got the last part right - "rarely have Canadians been less satisfied" - perhaps if he understood a bit better the things I have referred to in the first three comments, and following, he might understand this last a bit better, and be less puzzled.

Our Mr. Hancock however is far from finished with his fantasy - he carries on: "Our problem isn't a lack of democratic choice. .... In politics, as in economics, the consumer is king...."

Well - yes and no. Our problem indeed is not one of "choice" - we do have considerable choice in politics, although the efforts of the corporate press to marginalize anyone whose ideas they do not care to support might be worthy of some examination regarding this "choice" - but we also have an electoral system wherein we are not given what we have chosen, but very often the direct opposite, which can lead to considerable dissatisfaction. The recent election for example - Paul Martin will be leading the government with the approval of some 20% of eligible voters who voted for his party. Yes, this is a minority government - but in the last three elections which the Libs won (plus the prior one which Mulroney "won" with the same sort of numbers) they had strong majorities with the support of about 25% of the electorate! We were given the FTA in 1988 - against the wishes of a clear majority of Canadians who cared enough to vote, through a voting system that denied them their choice - the FTA which initiated very severe and radical changes to our country - against the wishes of most of us. So Mr. Hancock's "choice" is of little value, if we cannot have what we have chosen!

"..the consumer is king"?? - not in politics! - the voting system is the kingmaker!

"Nor do we want different policies...."

??????? What country has Mr. Hancock been inhabiting??? I don't know whether to laugh in disbelief or pinch myself to see if I am awake!!

EVERYBODY wants different policies!!! The rightwing neocons, led by the Fraser Institute and National Post and Asper papers and most others, think paying any taxes at all is too onerous for them, and want to reduce them more and more and more - hand in hand with their lower taxes, they think that using taxes to support a national health care system is not something we can afford and want most of it privatised - and they also think that we need to get fully involved in their REALLY crazy rightwing cousins in the US's policies about strutting around the world like macho cowboys bombing and terrorizing everyone they don't like - while those of us occupying more sane ground want some serious policy changes in terms of looking after both people (i.e. restoring our health care system to its former health and improving it a la the Romanov report rather than lower taxes lower taxes lower taxes) and the environment through such things as Kyoto, and getting rid of or at least seriously changing "trade" treaties like NAFTA that prevent our government from passing laws that "impact" on the profits of American corps producing dangerous toxicants and what not to protect the land we live on. Far from "everyone being happy" with the current policies of the government, there aren't that many policies of the governments of the last 20 years that anyone is happy with - which is, of course, the inevitable result of trying to please the wealthy people who actually run the country while pretending to be doing things for the good of the people of the country in general - the few rich want certain things such as lower taxes, and the many average people want certain things that require those tax dollars, and never the twain shall meet.

"... Who is against medicare, cultural diversity or immigration?..." !!!!! - hahahaha!!!! - where has Mr. Hancock been living that he has not heard of the "New Cons", formerly CRAP, Alliance, Reform - they're against all of these things and more!!!!

"Labels differ, but we're all liberals now. .... Why? Because that's what voters want."

My my my - now that's a statement worthy of the Great Dissembler himself, whoever that was (maybe the position is open and Mr. Hancock is looking for the award - one should warn him, though, there is a GREAT deal of competition in the Canadian media alone for this honour... ).

Voters might indeed WANT small-l, centrist liberal government type policies, and that might be what the major parties promise and pretend they are going to get to try to get elected - but the day after the election, no matter who has won from Mulroney to Chretien to Campbell to McGuinty, the promises fall by the wayside like the falling leaves in a fall storm - and out comes the real agenda, the far-right neocon program of privatisation, 3P, deregulation, globalisation, Americanization, corporatisation - lower taxes, slashed spending for We the People, government policies directed to increased profits for corporations and investors at the expense of average people, more "trade" agreements that are really Charters of Rights for multi-national corporations and Capital, more money for police and soldiers and guns and bombs and less for hospitals and schools and doctors and things to look after we the people rather than control us when we protest what is happening to our stolen country, and so on - it's been the pattern in Canada for 20 years now, and THAT is why Canadians are "dissatisfied" - and if all this is unclear to Mr. Hancock, he has little business running around calling himself an "analyst" for anyone.

It's not a mystery, Mr. Hancock - I cannot speak for all Canadians any more than you can, but for myself, I am sick of the lies and the deceit, the implementation of the neocon agenda which I am and have been for years completely opposed to. And I am sick of the fact that this neocon agenda has been imposed against the will of most of us - like those others, I am sick of voting for one thing and getting something else entirely. I am sick of the Canadian media, such as the paper in which your fantasy appeared, trying to convince me day after week after year after year that your program is what I want, when it is not, that it is "good" for me, when it very obviously is not, that it is somehow inevitable, which again, it most definitely is not, and that the "dissatisfaction" which you note is somehow the fault of my own uncontrolled desires, or unrealistic expectations, when in fact it is due to reasons such as I have stated above.

I want a Canada that works for We the People of Canada, not huge multinational corporations and their "investors" and banks and Capital. I want "trade" treaties that focus on fair trade for the great majority of people and workers in all countries, not profits for wealthy investors and banks. I want a voting system that puts the people I vote for into power in Ottawa, not this rigged system that has been giving us all 25% "majority" governments that keep doing things I and most Canadians do not want done. And I want more control of my "representatives", so when they start acting directly against my good, and breaking the promises they made to me during the election campaign, selling out to corporate lobbyists or promises of perks from the PMO, they don't get a free ride for 5 years of country-wrecking, but can be gotten rid of.

And most of all I want a media in this country that quits trying to pass off fantasies like yours as reality, and starts giving Canadians the truth for a change, about what you and your neocons have been doing to my country and the rest of the world for the last 30 years.

While I'm at it - why not peace on earth too?? hahahaha

(c'est moi! c'est moi!! hahahahaha)

- another piece in the Globe the same day - man, these guys are terrified that Real Democracy might start to rear its ugly head around here, I tell you! - hasn't been such concern since the 70s and the Crisis of Democracy of the Trilateral Commission - there's going to be a push for the next few months to see that we get back in the fucking box from whence we are trying to escape, I think! - this bit by Simpson on PR is just complete trashing, not to mention complete trash - Proportional representation: a permanent Bloc effect - a litany of lies and bullshit - I really wanted to do a long letter on it, but realised it would be even more of a waste of time than the Hancock one - something like this, Simpson, who is pretty high in the Elite minion-establishment and been supporting them for years, is quite obviously spinning and dissembling and even lying intentionally, to try and hammer this PR idea back into the box - they are absolutely terrified of PR, and the loss of power that would almost certainly entail for the Bay St people - at the very least, their plots and schemes would be a LOT more difficult to carry out, with People's Representatives having a chance to have some say in the National Parliament - hard to say for sure, but I expect most of the 40% of Canadians not voting would be happy enough to return to the flock or the ballot box if they felt their votes were actually going to result in somebody they wanted elected, getting elected, and those who were spooked into voting "strategically" to stop Harper could find better places to park their votes - man, wouldn't it be just so RAD to be able to vote for something you actually supported!!!!!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!! Then again, I believe in a lot of odd things. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

- couple of good movies with the dindin this week- School of Rock and Mona Lisa Smile - now, if you've seen them, you're probably thinking WHAT????? - they are a bit different in many ways - but the underlying message of both is the same - conventional society is a rat trap, and you have to get outside it somehow if you want to have a real life - great inspiring stuff - but again it's the mythology of modern society!!!! - I don't recall EVER seeing any teachers like these in my school days - I WAS constantly trying to break out of the box, and ALL I EVER got was "SHUT UP AND GET A HAIRCUT AND QUIT SKIPPING SCHOOL AND DO AS YOU ARE FUCKING TOLD!!!!!" (well, without you know HAHAHAHAHAHAA) - but seriously - the very LAST thing I ever got in any part of my school years was any kind of encouragement to get outside the box, to DARE to be non-conventional just a bit - just a constant stream for 13 years of DON'T THINK DO AS YOU'RE TOLD YOU CANNOT HAVE ANY AMBITION BEYOND BEING A COG TAKING ORDERS BLA BLA BLA BLA!!! - on and on and on. Yeaaaaaa NDHS HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!! I ESCAPED ANYWAY YOU FUCKERS HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

good movies though. Not great - not quite up to Dead Poet's Society, for instance, or maybe the Sidney Poitier classic To Sir With Love, a couple of the great films of the genre - but good.

Now if we could just make it all come true some day.....


- a sign of hope - even though you see sweet fuck all about it in the CORPORATE press - there are all kinds of people not only aware of what is going on here, but trying to do something about it - and NOW - NOW!!! - with this Internet - they can speak to others, others all over the world, not just within the limited range of their ability to personally meet with people in their own area as limited by their small bank accounts (pretty much all of us on the SANE side of things have small bank accounts, for some odd reason....) -

Ahhhh well - it is a small sign of hope, since rather than reading REAL stuff on the net, the masses are still addicted to that colourful but vapid box they watch 4-5-6+++ hours every day, which turns their brains into mush at an early age - but it is still hope, and that is enough to go on - has to be, it's all we got.

For now anyway.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAA - ah, another beer and another day is done.

One day closer to either sanity or the end.

Any bets??????????


The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in the insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well meaning but without understanding.
– Justice Louis Brandeis

I prefer to be true to myself, even at the hazard of incurring the ridicule of others, rather than to be false, and to incur my own abhorrence.
Frederick Douglas

"The most powerful weapon in the hands of the oppressor is the mind of the oppressed..." -Steven Biko

"I didn't say it would be easy. I just said it would be the truth."
- Morpheus

- and insofar as this grasshopper understands it, so it is.

"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind.” - Dr Seuss - man he was smart....... I gotta read some of that stuff again ..... that's almost as good a play on words as the great old line about comforting the afflicted and afflicting the comfortable.....

George Orwell: During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act

“It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it.” (Upton Sinclair - great writer - reading stuff like this helps understand how the problems of today are NOT new!!! - and is a clear indication of the truth of the old saying that he who does not know history is destined to repeat it, or whatever)

"Your failure to be informed does not make me a wacko." — John Loeffler

Write if ya want (ya gotta take the xxx off the front - I'm trying to reduce the intake from the spam assholes (oh yes you fucking are - it is NOT amusing - get a fucking life why don't you, instead of bothering people - how fucking stupid can you be?? If you were the last fucking product on earth I wouldn't buy anything from you!! Fuck.)).

What direct action did you take today to do something to get rid of corporate government in Canada besides deleting spam? Do you feel that it was enough, given the situation? Will you feel content telling that to your grandchildren, should they survive, and the country, and the planet?

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: With thanks to the Editors of the Toronto Star, Globe and Mail, Ottawa Citizen, Ch'town Guardian, Vancouver Sun, and others I cannot think of at the moment, for their refusal to print my letters over the last few years on various issues of national import - had I even a hope of being printed occasionally in these fora and my voice acknowledged in the national debate, I would undoubtedly not have bothered putting all this together. Cheers!

(for the legal-minded types - all this stuff not otherwise credited to some newspaper or something IS original, and thus copyright by Rude Macedon - I don't even have to say it - check it out - but given that, repost at will, with acknowledgement. Letting me know (remove the xx - see above HAHAHAA) would be nice too - and we do want to be nice people in a nice world, don't we? Isn't that why we are doing what we are doing, to get rid of the liars and crooks (NOT nice people) who are running things now?)

8,978,976,745 people (that'd be yer SCpoll, correct within 0.5 percentage points, 18 or 19 times out of 23, as long as it's Tuesday and the moon is full where you sit, and there hasn't been a special dispensation by Neptune cancelling those caveats under security code X37.25, and nobody was lying or trying to get off the phone quick because they were watching Survivor or Bangkok Ladies on Motorcycles) have visited this site in the last 13 or so hours, Paul Martin's our new PM and owes the Bay St. Boys 12 million worth of favors and George Bush is talking to ALLAH on his red phone, direct line, as you read. Which of those statements do you find the most unbelievable? Why? Do you know where Frodo and Gandalf went on that boat? Can we call them? Maybe the really nice elf lady too HAHAHA!!! And Smith - don't forget Smith ....