Confessions of a Reluctant Conspiracy Theorist
Brian Salter 29 December 2001
The Collective Unconscious seems to have fired an early warning shot across my bow. All summer long I had a growing interest in visiting Central Asia, something that I had been considering for over a year but which then mushroomed into a mild obsession. A month before the September 11 attacks, I had resolved to act on this, and arranged a meeting with a friend in the travel business to plan an itinerary through western China and the 'stans. Simultaneously, an interest in political conspiracies and secret elite societies which I had been pursuing in a sporadic manner for a couple years (after having previously been a disinterested skeptic toward such subjects) began to escalate rapidly into a full-fledged drive, even to the point of bringing on anxiety and depression. My housemates inquired with concern about my perturbed condition, as I grimly drilled through new stacks of obscure books I had acquired. I tried to fight off these intrusive feelings, especially because I was only a couple months away from moving away to start a new life overseas in a new country, and felt that I should have been enthusiastically happy about that. A hidden truth was, however, that about a year previously I had more or less just awakened one morning with the disturbing hunch, based partly on study and research but for the most part on what I was emotionally picking up on all around me, that America was heading down the road to a future rendezvous with some new kind of fascism. I had heard a few people say this before, and I would find later that many intelligent people have been arguing this for years, but this was the first time I really viscerally believed it myself. Although this was actually a major motivation in my decision to leave the country, I did not share it with anyone, not wanting to take on the emotional burden of defending and explaining a "wacko paranoia" that I was not yet completely able to explain to myself.
Many people described the 9/11 attack as a "wake up call" which changed everything. But since I had already come to the conclusion that the goings-on in the world are generally amiss and heading down the wrong road, it felt like less of a wake up call and more like a late-morning triple espresso. Based on what I had been learning about the world, as well as the nagging inklings in my mind, there was nothing fundamentally surprising about the attack, except of course for the immediate shock and horror over the terrible suffering of the victims and the nation as a whole. Like many, I was offended and turned off by the mainstream media after being glued to the Tube for a couple of days; feeling myself quickly becoming addicted to the shallow, perpetual cycle of fear mongering and talking head "solutions" which they use to hook viewers, I decided to forego TV news and even many mainstream papers and magazines, instead choosing the internet as my main source of information.
From the very start, I have smelled a rat, and so I have spent a great deal of time with alternative sources which have a track record of delving into government corruption and political conspiracies. I have been fortunate in that I am working only part time at the moment, so for the past months I have been spending as much as 40-60 hours per week doing nothing but scouring alternative and underground news to try and inform myself on what is really going on. What has emerged through the cracks is a pattern of information which strongly suggests that the terrorist attack on America and the alleged "massive failure of intelligence" which let it slip through may be of a very different nature than is being portrayed by the government and mainstream media. The pattern suggests strongly what many may find nearly unthinkable that high-placed insiders somewhere in America's government knew explicitly of the plot beforehand but saw fit to let it happen anyway, assumedly to gain a justification for certain pre- established geopolitical policy objectives, both domestic and foreign. It has been revealed that ongoing law enforcement investigations which might have averted the 9/ 11 attacks were deliberately obstructed and stalled by top government officials, including probably some within the Bush administration itself. Furthermore, there is clear evidence that America's military air defences were ordered to stay on the ground during the hijackings, and also clear evidence showing that preparations and plans had long been underway, since at least last spring, for a military intervention in Afghanistan at almost exactly the same point in time last fall. The disturbing questions and implications raised by this information have thus far been almost completely ignored by Congress and totally blacked out by the mainstream media, and despite being worthy of full-fledged scandal, have so far been dismissed and left marginalized for the most part in "conspiracy" circles.
I am apalled by this situation. An Alice in Wonderland standard of truth now seems to rule in America... Eighty percent of the American people (or so we're told) stood immediately behind a war which has taken at least as many innocent lives as 9/11 and seems to be causing a terrible refugee crisis, having accepted that it was "just" to wage such a war even in the absence of convincing proof of the accused perpetrators' guilt, as well as the lack of a convincing argument that such a war would be an effective way to capture those perpetrators (as we have seen so far, it ain't). Yet at the same time, those who have dared to ask probing questions about the glaring inconsistencies in the government's behavior and explanations are, so far, generally seen by most as raving lunatics, even if the theories they offer better fit the known facts. Is this just a result of paralyzing fear and mind-controlling propaganda? Perhaps... but this is really the way it always has been with any subject that strays into the forbidden territory of the dreaded "conspiracy theory." And this is where the real problems start.
A lot of curious stuff goes on that seems simply to get lost under the obtuse, noisy racket of the American media sphere. Gerald Ford, in a recent interview, more or less admitted that he willingly helped concoct and advocate for the "magic bullet" theory that became pivotal in the findings of the Warren Commision which he headed (this scientifically fraudulent yarn allowed the commission to claim that JFK was shot at only by the officially designated "lone nut" Lee Harvey Oswald). Well, now that the political cabal which (indirectly?) benefitted from the death of JFK has been at the top of the American totem pole for nearly forty years, perhaps it is safe to begin making some casual admissions! As it happened, this went over without much notice or general comment at all. As long as the huge body of research and writing that has been devoted to the 1963 coup d'etat continues to be categorically dismissed in top media and academic circles as a "popular fad" and "only speculation, no facts," the average self-respecting American will probably still mistakenly assume that there's no point in spending precious time delving into it to try and dig out the nuggets (as I used to think). This is no accident. When he was being questioned by an associate about whether the public would stomach the many obvious omissions and fabrications in the Warren Commission Report which was then being readied for relase, legendary CIA spook Allen Dulles is reported to have replied, dryly, "the American people don't read."
For years, I stubbornly believed that I was smarter than the average Joe for not allowing myself to get "suckered into" such kooky stuff as JFK assasination theories, but when I eventually got around to taking a more serious and earnest look at this and other conspiracy topics a few years ago, I very soon found myself feeling a bit ill... from having to eat so much humble pie, that is. There simply came a point where I had seen too many situations, one after the other, where the wacko nutcases actually seemed to be right, at least in a general sense, and I could no longer cling to my previous assumptions about how the world really worked. The fact is that almost always, the real truth winds up being somewhere inbetween the smug, straight-arrow skeptics and the bug-eyed paranoiacs. In my past attitudes, and in the current attitudes of many around me, I see a tendency to defend against unorthodox or alternative ideas by resorting to comforting pseudo-psychology, insisting that those who show an interest in things like "conspiracy theories" must be doing so out of some emotional need, or a "pathology of belief", rather than informed rationality. This implies snidely that everyone else is always grounded and logical... but the truth is, everybody has a pathology of belief especially in times like these. This is an operating assumption of mine that is deeply influencing the way I look at current events. In the new Internet age of quick and unfettered access to information, it has become a clich? for pundits to observe that it is easier than ever for people to become knee-jerk, uninformed "conspiracy theory" believers. Like most clich?s, it exists because it is generally true. However, I have very seldom heard anyone state the quite obvious corollary: that it is also every bit as easy now to be a knee-jerk, uninformed "conspiracy theory" disbeliever. All the intellectual armchair quarterback needs to say these days when facing a new controversial idea is "Oh, I think there's just a few too many X-files fans running around out there!"
Concerning the aftermath of 9/11, a number of people have made the apt comment that we are now all conspiracy theorists including the government! The only question is, whose conspiracy theory will turn out to be conspiracy fact? The "official story" of who perpetrated 9/11 the terrorist network, the circumstances that enabled them to pull off the attack, and why it happened is a classic conspiracy theory through and through, and frankly not a very good one, as it is still beset with unanswered questions and factual gaps. Worse than being simply unproven to a courtroom standard (which may by now be beside the point), it is on a number of significant points self- contradictory and incredible. I am stunned and shocked that most of the American people have seemed content from the very start to swallow this story whole, or at least find it acceptable by default.
Even on many "alternative" or "dissident" online political discussion forums, I have seen little pointed questioning of the 9/11 events themselves, which is a terrible mistake. As one example, I feel that many anti-war progressives actually did the war hawks quite a favor at the outset while it is has been absolutely justified to bring focus and criticism on the policy questions and troubling ethical aspects of the war in Afghanistan, to do so without also bringing up serious challenges to the tacitly accepted "facts" of the 9/11 terrorist plot itself ironically serves quite effectively to validate, in a backhanded way, the very notion that pointing our guns at Afghanistan and supposedly all-powerful "?ber-lone-nut" Osama bin Laden made some sort of overall sense in the first place. I have observed, much to my dismay, self-appointed thought police using blustering ridicule to eradicate troubling questions about the possible evidence & motives for official malfeasance and/or complicity from otherwise free-ranging online discussions even when some of the questions being raised are quite valid and worthy of keeping open (the "debunking" strategy: 1. select the most obviously weak arguments and rip them apart; 2. ignore the really difficult "smoking gun" arguments and pretend they were never mentioned; 3. fire an overly condescending, derisive volley to intimidate open-minded onlookers and nip the topic in the bud. Or, simply begin with name calling and leave it at that). Oh no, we can't let those awful, creepy, insidious "conspiracy buffs" have a seat at the table!
What I am most afraid of now is not suitcase nukes, nor smallpox, nor terrorists of any sort; it is not the criminal, homicidal CIA / neo-colonialist cabal that orignally sowed the seeds of the current crisis, nor is it even the threat of world war that may break out as a result. All of these things are alarming and truly dangerous, but what I am most afraid now of is the unthinking, knee-jerk reaction of far too many who, when confronted with a well-evidenced and well-argued alternative explanation of the origin and nature of this supposed "War on Terrorism", are likely to resort simply to self-righteous denial or aggrivated stonewalling. Granted, at this point in time it's fair for people to be wary of new "conspiracy theories", but as a thinking person I'm angered that the dialogue over such things has become absurdly polarized and reactionary. Even amongst well educated and intellectual circles people who might be in a position make a crucial contribution in these disturbing times one can always find those who consider it perenially fashionable and de rigeur to pompously distance onesself as far as possible from anything that one's own favored brand of groupthink might label a "conspiracy theory", and to attack proponents of any such ideas with ad-hominem put- downs, adhering to a lazy pseudo-skepticism which entails making minimal or zero active effort to absorb the tremendous body of information necessary to make a good judgement, instead choosing to recline into one's well-worn armchair, thump one's intellectual chest, and bellow defensive pronouncements about the "irrationality" of those "tinfoil-hat-wearing paranoid nutcases." This sort of attitude is far removed from the open-minded, responsive, and actively questioning type of skepticism that marks a true thinking person. I'll admit, I'm painting an extreme picture here, but I would hasten to add that denial and avoidance committed in the name of "rationality" can also take forms that are far more subtle and deceptively convincing.
This, I feel, is the real danger. Notwithstanding the fact that great numbers of attention- getting paranoid nutcases and their associated hairball ideas verifiably do exist out there, I nevertheless now count myself among the ranks of an ever-growing segment of reasonable, informed, and intelligent people who have patiently come to the conclusion that, hidden amongst all the obvious rubbish and rumor, there is indeed very credible and compelling evidence for the existence of a powerful and long- evolving international conspiracy, composed of a relatively small, private elite who have been aiming for global economic control, the surreptitious and gradual dissolution of national sovereignty, and ultimately world dictatorship. This conspiracy has been in development behind the scenes for decades (at least), establishing strong bases of power in America within the corporate elite, the National Security infrastructure, and the sprawling, privatized Military-Industrial complex, and now appears to have succesfully used its influence to frame-up the provocation for a bogus "War on Terrorism," setting the stage for a final duplicitous endgame. If this is true, then we are currently witnessing a crucially important transition period.
Despite the emotionally overwhelming implications of this scenario, I do not feel at all that it is too late to take action, and after some struggle I have made the commitment to myself to do whatever I can to help oppose it. Part of me would like to think that it would be alright just to "wait and see," enforcing yet more self-doubt before I speak out, but every nerve in my body tells me that this is just not going to cut it; there's a point when you feel you've learned enough and sensed enough, beyond which there is no possibility of turning your back. I would certainly be a lot happier if I could erase certain knowledge and convictions from my mind believe me, I don't get off on this stuff and I'm not in it for thrills.
Granted, I may be mistaken in my convictions, and in fact I truly hope that I am, because all I really want deep in my heart right now is just to continue on with healing after the recent horrors and return to enjoying what should be the good years of my life. But if I am indeed wrong, the wisest and most prudent way to settle the matter under the current circumstances is first to make every possible effort to prove that I am right. I consider myself sufficiently skeptical, but others may come to more limited conclusions than I have. In the very least, what can be asserted without caveats is that the government of the United States is now acquiring, via the new powers assigned to federal law enforcement and the Executive Branch, almost every ability needed to function as a police state. Whether or not this will happen is at this point not a question of fact, but of faith. I believe this is the right time to blow the discussion wide open while we still have the chance, not to narrow it down. So, in that spirit, I have decided to throw my two cents in by putting together this little website with the intention of sharing useful information with those I care about. No one can say yet with absolute certainty whether any of the "conspiracy theories" we've heard about 9/11 are correct, but I will state with no doubts whatsoever that given the facts that are already out there, to continue to deny these theories an open and unbiased hearing and thorough investigation is 100 percentwrong.
Furthermore, I wish to make it clear that I am not out to shock; I am not trying to provoke lurid fears, but instead striving to join the ranks of those who counter misdirected fear with reason. I am motivated by the deepest feelings of patriotism and a desire to defend the integrity of the Constitutional Republic of the United States of America, which I believe is in under unprecedented threat a situation that bodes ill for the entire world. If anyone suggested that those who speak out with the types of controversial views I am going to present are a cynical, unpatriotic types who do harm to America's unity, I would simply counter that anyone who has become blinded with proud denial of the possibile dangers from enemies within is no patriot at all. America has always had some troubling flaws, but even so I have recently shed a few tears thinking about the death and loss of an older and better version of America, one which used to be more peaceful, humble, which minded its own business and was in turn truly admired around the world without qualification. I hope I live to see that kind of America make a great return, better and wiser than ever before.
In this introduction, I have given free rein to my opinions and beliefs, but in the pages that follow it is my intention to present the facts and questions posed by variety of other individuals and web sources on their own terms and attempt to synthesize these into as unified as possible of an analysis, with a minimum of judgement (if I can help myself!). The last thing I want to do is present myself as some kind of expert; there are many people out there both more intelligent and more experienced than I who make my still limited knowledge of political conspiracies look downright childish by comparison. However, with so much new information and analysis coming out, I saw the need for it to be presented in a clear overview. I hope this site will be a useful initial guide through a bramble of underground information and speculation, helping you to form your own opinions and come to your own conclusions.
29 December 2001
Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance!
Your failure to be informed does not make me a wacko.
Debunking conspiracy theorists' paranoid fantasies about Sept. 11
by Gerard Holmgren firstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright Gerard Holmgren. Jan 2003.
This work may be freely copied and distributed without permission as long as it not for commercial use. Please include the author's name, the web address where you found it and the copyright notice.
Astute observers of history are aware that for every notable event there will usually be at least one ,often several wild conspiracy theories which spring up around it. "The CIA killed Hendrix" " The Pope had John Lennon murdered ", "Hitler was half Werewolf", "Space aliens replaced Nixon with a clone" etc,etc. The bigger the event, the more ridiculous and more numerous are the fanciful rantings which circulate in relation to it.
So its hardly surprising that the events of Sept 11 2001 have spawned their fair share of these ludicrous fairy tales. And as always, there is - sadly - a small but gullible percentage of the population eager to lap up these tall tales, regardless of facts or rational analysis.
One of the wilder stories circulating about Sept 11, and one that has attracted something of a cult following amongst conspiracy buffs is that it was carried out by 19 fanatical Arab hijackers, masterminded by an evil genius named Osama bin Laden, with no apparent motivation other than that they "hate our freedoms."
Never a group of people to be bothered by facts, the perpetrators of this cartoon fantasy have constructed an elaborately woven web of delusions and unsubstantiated hearsay in order to promote this garbage across the internet and the media to the extent that a number of otherwise rational people have actually fallen under its spell.
Normally I don't even bother debunking this kind of junk, but the effect that this paranoid myth is beginning to have requires a little rational analysis, in order to consign it to the same rubbish bin as all such silly conspiracy theories.
These crackpots even contend that the extremist Bush
regime was caught unawares by the attacks, had no hand in organizing them, and actually would have stopped them if it had been able. Blindly ignoring the stand down of the US air- force, the insider trading on airline stocks - linked to the CIA, the complicit behavior of Bush on the morning of the attacks, the controlled demolition of the WTC, the firing of a missile into the Pentagon and a host of other documented proofs that the Bush regime was behind the attacks, the conspiracy theorists stick doggedly to a silly story about 19 Arab hijackers somehow managing to commandeer 4 planes simultaneously and fly them around US airspace for nearly 2 hours ,crashing them into important buildings, without the US intelligence services having any idea that it was coming, and without the Air Force knowing what to do.
The huge difficulties with such a stupid story force them to invent even more preposturous stories to distract from its core silliness, and thus the tale has escalated into a mythic fantasy of truly gargantuan proportions.
It's difficult to apply rational analysis to such unmitigated stupidity, but that is the task which I take on in this article. However, it should be noted that one of the curious characteristics of conspiracy theorists is that they effortlessly change their so called evidence in response to each aspect which is debunked. As soon as one delusion is unmasked, they simply invent another to replace it, and deny that the first ever existed. Eventually, when they have turned full circle through this endlessly changing fantasy fog , they then re-invent the original delusion and deny that you ever debunked it, thus beginning the circle once more. This technique is known as "the fruit loop" and saves the conspiracy theorist from ever having to see any of their ideas through to their (ill)logical conclusions.
According to the practitioners of the fruit loop, 19 Arabs took over the 4 planes by subduing the passengers and crew through the use of guns,knives,box cutters and gas, and then used electronic guidance systems which they had smuggled on board to fly the planes to their targets.
The suspension of disbelief required for this outrageous concoction is only for the hard core conspiracy theorist. For a start, they conveniently skip over the awkward fact that there weren't any Arabs on the planes. If there were, one must speculate that they somehow got on board without being filmed by any of the security cameras and without being registered on the passenger lists. But the curly question of how they are supposed to have got on board is all too mundane for the exciting world of the conspiracy theorist. With vague mumblings that they must have been using false ID ( but never specifying which IDs they are alleged to have used, or how these were traced to their real identities), they quickly bypass this problem, to relate exciting and sinister tales about how some of the fictitious fiends were actually searched before boarding because they looked suspicious. However, as inevitably happens with any web of lies, this simply paints them into an even more difficult corner. How are they supposed to have got on board with all that stuff if they were searched ? And if they used gas in a confined space, they would have been affected themselves unless they also had masks in their luggage.
"Excuse me sir, why do you have a boxcutter, a gun, a container of gas, a gas mask and an electronic guidance unit in your luggage?"
"A present for your grandmother? Very well sir, on you get."
"Very strange", thinks the security officer. "That's the fourth Arabic man without an Arabic name who just got on board with a knife, gun or boxcutter and gas mask. And why does that security camera keep flicking off every time one these characters shows up? Must be one of those days I guess..."
Asking any of these basic questions to a conspiracy theorist is likely to cause a sudden leap to the claim that we know that they were on board because they left a credit card trail for the tickets they had purchased and cars they had rented. So if they used credit cards that identified them, how does that reconcile with the claim that they used false IDs to get on to the plane? But by this time ,the fruit loop is in full swing, as the conspiracy theorist tries to stay one jump ahead of this annoying and awkward rational analysis.They will allege that the hijackers' passports were found at the crash scenes. "So there!" they exalt triumphantly, their fanatical faces lighting up with that deranged look of one who has just a revelation of questionable sanity.
Hmm? So they got on board with false IDs but took their real passports with them? However, by this time the fruit loop has been completely circumnavigated,and the conspiracy theorist exclaims impatiently, "Who said anything about false IDs? We know what seats they were sitting in! Their presence is well documented!" And so the whole loop starts again. "Well, why aren't they on the passenger lists?"
"You numbskull! They assumed the identities of other passengers!" And so on...
Finally, out of sheer fascination with this circular method of creative delusion , the rational sceptic will allow them to get away with this loop, in order to move on to the next question, and see what further delights await us in the unraveling of this marvelously stupid story.
"Uh, how come their passports survived fiery crashes that completely incinerated the planes and all the passengers? " The answer of course is that its just one of those strange co- incidences, those little quirks of fate that do happen from time to time. You know, like the same person winning the lottery four weeks in a row. The odds are astronomical, but these things do happen...
This is another favourite deductive method of the conspiracy theorist. The "improbability drive" , in which they decide upon a conclusion without any evidence whatsoever to support it, and then continually speculate a series of wildly improbable events and unbelievable co-incidences to support it, shrugging off the implausibility of each event with the vague assertion that sometimes the impossible happens (just about all the time in their world). There is a principle called "Occam's razor" which suggests that in the absence of evidence to the contrary, the simplest explanation is most likely to be correct. Conspiracy theorists hate Occam's razor.
Having for the sake of amusement, allowed them to get away with with the silly story of the 19 invisible Arabs, we move on to the question of how they are supposed to have taken over the planes.
Hijacking a plane is not an easy thing to do. Hijacking it without the pilot being able to alert ground control is near impossible. The pilot has only to punch in a four digit code to alert ground control to a hijacking. Unconcerned with the awkward question of plausibility, the conspiracy buffs maintain that on that Sept 11, the invisible hijackers took over the plane by the rather crude method of threatening people with boxcutters and knives, and spraying gas (after they had attached their masks, obviously), but somehow took control of the plane without the crew first getting a chance to punch in the hijacking code. Not just on one plane, but on all four. At this point in the tale, the conspiracy theorist is again forced to call upon the services of the improbability drive.
So now that our incredibly lucky hijackers have taken control of the planes, all four pilots fly them with breath taking skill and certainty to their fiery end, all four pilots unflinching in their steely resolve for a swift meeting with Allah. Apart from their psychotic hatred of "our freedoms" , it was their fanatical devotion to Islam which enabled them to summon up the iron will to do this. Which is strange, because according to another piece of hearsay peddled by the conspiracy buffs, these guys actually went out drinking and womanizing the night before their great martyrdom, even leaving their Korans in the bar -really impeccable Islamic behavior - and then got up at 5am the next morning to pull off the greatest covert operation in history. This also requires us to believe that they were even clear headed enough to learn how to fly the huge planes by reading flight manuals in Arabic in the car on the way to the airport. We know this because they supposedly left the flight manuals there for us to find.
It gets better. Their practical training had allegedly been limited to Cessnas and flight simulators, but this was no barrier to the unflinching certainty with which they took over the planes and skillfully guided them to their doom. If they are supposed to have done their flight training with these tools, which would be available just about anywhere in the world, its not clear why they would have decided to risk blowing their cover to US intelligence services by doing the training in Florida, rather than somewhere in the Middle East, but such reasoning is foreign to the foggy world of the conspiracy theorist , too trapped in the constant rotation of the mental fruit loop to make their unsubstantiated fabrications seem even semi-believable.
Having triumphantly established a circular delusion in support of the mythical Arabs, the conspiracy theorist now confronts the difficult question of why there's nothing left of the planes. Anybody who has seen the endlessly replayed footage of the second plane going into the WTC will realize that the plane was packed with explosives. Planes do not and cannot blow up into nothing in that manner when they crash.
Did the mythical Arabs also haul a huge heap of explosives on board, and mange to deploy them in such a manner that they went off in the exact instant of the crash, completely vapourizing the plane? This is a little difficult even for the conspiracy theorist, who at this point decides that its easier to invent new laws of physics in order to keep the delusion rolling along.
There weren't any explosives. It wasn't an inside job. The plane blew up into nothing from its exploding fuel load! Remarkable! Sluggishly combustible jet fuel which is basically kerosine,and which burns at a maximum temperature of around 800 C has suddenly taken on the qualities of a ferociously explosive demolition agent, vapourizing 65 tons of aircraft into a puff of smoke. Never mind that a plane of that size contains around 15 tons of steel and titanium, of which even the melting points are about double that of the maximum combustion temperature of kerosine - let alone the boiling point - which is what would be required to vapourize a plane. And then there's about 50 tons of aluminium to be accounted for. In excess of 15lbs of metal for each gallon of kerosine.
For the conspiracy theorist, such inconvenient facts are vaguely dismissed as "mumbo jumbo". This convenient little phrase is their answer to just about anything factual or logical. Like a conjurer pulling a rabbit out of a hat, they suddenly become fanatically insistent about the devastating explosive qualities of kerosine, something hitherto completely unknown to science, but just discovered by them, this very minute. Blissfully ignoring the fact that never before or since in aviation history has a plane vapourized into nothing from an exploding fuel load, the conspiracy theorist relies upon Hollywood images, where the effects are are always larger than life, and certainly larger than the intellects of these cretins.
"Its a well known fact that planes blow up into nothing on impact." they state with pompous certainty. "Watch any Bruce Willis movie."
"Care to provide any documented examples? If it's a well known fact, then presumably this well known fact springs from some kind of documentation - other than Bruce Willis movies ?"
At this point the mad but cunning eyes of the conspiracy theorist will narrow as they sense the corner that they have backed themselves into, and plan their escape by means of another stunning backflip.
"Ah, but planes have never crashed into buildings before, so there's no way of telling." they counter with a sly grin.
Well, actually planes have crashed into buildings before and since, and not vapourized into nothing.
"But not big planes, with that much fuel ", they shriek in hysterical denial.
Or that much metal to vapourize.
"Yes but not hijacked planes!"
"Are you suggesting that whether the crash is deliberate or accidental affects the combustion qualities of the fuel?"
"Now you're just being silly".
Although collisions with buildings are rare, planes frequently crash into mountains, streets, other aircraft, nosedive into the ground,or have bombs planted aboard them, and don't vapourize into nothing. What's so special about a tower that's mostly glass? But by now, the conspiracy theorist has once again sailed happily around the fruit loop. "Its a well documented fact that planes explode into nothing on impact."
Effortlessly weaving back and forth between the position that its a "well known fact" and that "its never happened before, so we have nothing to compare it to", the conspiracy theorist has now convinced themselves ( if not too many other people) that the WTC plane was not loaded with explosives, and that the instant vapourization of the plane in a massive fireball was the same as any other plane crash you might care to mention. Round and round the fruit. loop...
But the hurdles which confront the conspiracy theorist are many, and they are now forced to implement even more creative uses for the newly discovered shockingly destructive qualities of kerosine. They have to explain how the Arabs also engineered the elegant veritcal collapse of both the WTC towers, and for this awkward fact the easiest counter is to simply deny that it was a controlled demolition, and claim that the buildings collapsed from fire caused by the burning kerosine.
For this, its necessary to sweep aside the second law of thermodynamics and propose kerosine which is not only impossibly destructive, but also recycles itself for a second burning in violation of the law of degradation of energy. You see, it not only consumed itself in a sudden catastrophic fireball , vapourizing a 65 ton plane into nothing, but then came back for a second go, burning at 2000C for another hour at the impact point, melting the skyscraper's steel like butter. And while it was doing all this it also poured down the elevator shafts, starting fires all through the building. When I was at school there was a little thing called the entropy law which suggests that a given portion of fuel can only burn once, something which is readily observable in the real world, even for those who didn't make it to junior high school science. But this is no problem for the conspiracy theorist. Gleefully, they claim that a few thousand gallons of kerosine is enough to
:completely vapourize a 65 ton aircraft
:have enough left over to burn ferociously enough for over an hour at the impact point to melt steel ( melting point about double the maximum combustion temperature of the fuel )
:still have enough left over to pour down the elevator shafts and start similarly destructive fires all through the building.
This kerosine really is remarkable stuff! How chilling to realize that those kerosine heaters we had in the house when I was a kid were deadly bombs, just waiting to go off. One false move and the entire street might have been vapourized. And never again will I take kerosine lamps out camping. One moment you're there innocently holding the lamp - the next - kapow! Vapourized into nothing along with with the rest of the camp site, and still leaving enough of the deadly stuff to start a massive forest fire.
These whackos are actually claiming that the raging inferno allegedly created by the miraculously recycling, and impossibly hot burning kerosine melted or at least softened the steel supports of the skyscraper. Oblivious to the fact that the smoke coming from the WTC was black, which indicates an oxygen starved fire -therefore, not particularly hot, they trumpet an alleged temperature in the building of 2000 C , without a shred of evidence to support this curious suspension of the laws of physics.
Not content with this ludicrous garbage, they then contend that as the steel frames softened, they came straight down instead of buckling and twisting and falling sideways.
Since they're already re-engineered the combustion qualities of jet fuel, violated the second law of thermodynamics, and re-defined the structural properties of steel, why let a little thing like the laws of gravity get in the way?
The tower fell in a time almost identical to that of a free falling object, dropped from that height, meaning that its physically impossible for it to have collapsed by the method of the top floors smashing through the lower floors. But according to the conspiracy theorists, the laws of gravity were temporarily suspended on the morning of Sept 11. It appears that the evil psychic power of those dreadful Arabs knew no bounds. Even after they were dead, they were able, by the power of their evil spirits, to force down the tower at a speed physically impossible under the laws of gravity, had it been meeting any resistance from fireproofed steel structures originally designed to resist many tons of hurricane force wind as well as the impact of a Boeing passenger jet straying off course.
Clearly, these conspiracy nuts never did their science homework at school, but did become extremely adept at inventing tall tales for why.
"Muslim terrorists stole my notes, sir"
"No miss, the kerosine heater blew up and vapourized everything in the street, except for my passport."
"You see sir, the schoolbus was hijacked by Arabs who destroyed my homework because they hate our freedoms."
Or perhaps they misunderstood the term "creative science" and mistakenly thought that coming up with such rubbish was in fact, their science homework.
The ferocious heat generated by this ghastly kerosine was, according to the conspiracy theorists, the reason why so many of the WTC victims can't be identified. DNA is destroyed by heat. (Although 2000 C isn't really required, 100C will generally do the job.) This is quite remarkable, because according to the conspiracy theorist, the nature of DNA suddenly changes if you go to a different city.
That's right! If you are killed by an Arab terrorist in NY, your DNA will be destroyed by such temperatures. But if you are killed by an Arab terrorist in Washington DC, your DNA will be so robust that it can survive temperatures which completely vapourize a 65 ton aircraft.
You see, these loonies have somehow concocted the idea that the missile which hit the pentagon was not a missile at all, but one of the hijacked planes. And to prove this unlikely premise, they point to a propaganda statement from the Bush regime, which rather stupidly claims that all but one of the people aboard the plane were identified from the site by DNA testing, even though nothing remains of the plane. The plane was vapourized by the fuel tank explosion maintain these space loonies, but the people inside it were all but one identified by DNA testing.
So there we have it. The qualities of DNA are different, depending upon which city you're in, or perhaps depending upon which fairy story you're trying to sell at any particular time.
This concoction about one of the hijacked planes hitting the Pentagon really is a howler. For those not familiar with the layout of the Pentagon, it consists of 5 rings of building, each with a space inbetween. Each ring of building is about 30 to 35 ft deep, with a similar amount of open space between it and the next ring. The object which penetrated the Pentagon went in at about a 45 degree angle, punching a neat circular hole of about a 12 ft diameter through three rings ( six walls).A little later a section of wall about 65 ft wide collapsed in the outer ring. Since the plane which the conspiracy theorists claim to be responsible for the impact had a wing span of 125 ft and a length of 155 ft, and there was no wreckage of the plane, either inside or outside the building, and the lawns outside were still smooth and green enough to play golf on, this crazy delusion is clearly physically impossible.
But hey, we've already disregarded the combustion qualities of jet fuel, the normal properties of common building materials, the properties of DNA, the laws of gravity and the second law of thermodynamics, so what the hell - why not throw in a little spatial impossibility as well ? I would have thought that the observation that a solid object cannot pass through another solid object without leaving a hole at least as big as itself is reasonably sound science. But to the conspiracy theorist, this is "mumbo jumbo". It conflicts with the delusion that they're hooked on, so it "must be wrong" although trying to get them to explain exactly how it could be wrong is a futile endeavour.
Conspiracy theorists fly into a curious panic whenever the Pentagon missile is mentioned.They nervously maintain that the plane was vapourized by it's exploding fuel load and point to the WTC crash as evidence of this behavior. (That's a wonderful fruit loop.) Like an insect which has just been sprayed, running back and forth in its last mad death throes, they first argue that the reason the hole is so small is that the plane never entered the wall, having blown up outside, and then suddenly backflip to explain the 250 ft deep missile hole by saying that the plane disappeared all the way into the building, and then blew up inside the building (even though the building shows no sign of such damage). As for what happened to the wings - here's where they get really creative. The wings snapped off and folded into the fuselage which then carried them into the building, which then closed up behind the plane like a piece of meat.
When it suits them, they'll also claim that the plane slid in on its belly, (ignoring the undamaged lawn) while at the same time citing alleged witnesses to the plane diving steeply into the building from an "irrecoverable angle." How they reconcile these two scenarios as being compatible is truly a study in stupidity.
Once they get desperate enough, you can be sure that the UFO conspiracy stuff will make an appearance. The Arabs are in league with the Martians. Space aliens snatched the remains of the Pentagon plane and fixed most of the hole in the wall, just to confuse people. They gave the Arabs invisibility pills to help get them onto the planes. Little green men were seen talking to Bin Laden a few weeks prior to the attacks.
As the nation gears up to impeach the traitor Bush, and stop his perpetual oil war, it's not helpful to have these idiots distracting from the process by spreading silly conspiracy theories about mythical Arabs, stories which do nothing but play into the hands of the extremist Bush regime.
At a less serious time, we might tolerate such crackpots with amused detachment, but they need to understand that the treachery that was perpetrated on Sept 11, and the subsequent war crimes committed in "retaliation" are far too serious for us to allow such frivolous self indulgence to go unchallenged.
Those who are truly addicted to conspiracy delusions should find a more appropriate outlet for their paranoia.
Its time to stop loony conspiracy theories about Sept 11.
The Pentagon missile theory is the Number One Most Contentious issue amongst 911- skeptics. The arguments have been very heated.
Early news releases included three photographs that seemed to show aircraft debris at the Pentagon, but missile theory advocates disagree that the fragments came from a jetliner. Very recently more photos have been located, but some of them have no context to prove they were from the Pentagon. (See http://www.rense.com/general32/phot.htm)
Everyone agrees that if the plane didn't crash at the Pentagon, it must have gone somewhere else -- but no trace has been found. David McGowan mentioned that a reader wrote him to say that there were media reports of a plane crash in Colorado that day, which were quickly squelched and never heard from again.
Personally I am inclined to accept the photographs showing that an airliner struck the Pentagon, even though there are many troubling inconsistencies in this version of events. However, I have no reason to doubt the sincerity or the sanity of anyone who has taken the other side in this issue.
If an airliner did strike the Pentagon, how was this accomplished? See my page entitled "Hani Hanjour, aerobatic pilot?" for more discussion. ]